On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: >> RDFa needed a way to specify the property designated by arbitrary >> elements. Overloading @name would not have been realistic, since @name >> already has different meanings on different elements (e.g. as a >> fragment identifier, as a form submission key). > > Oh, I thought that was addressed/solved by the attribute "scheme"; > is that not the case ? Not really. @scheme disambiguates names in meta @name (RDFa tries to solve the same problem with CURIEs, prefixing, namespacing). But @scheme cannot distinguish between utterly different meanings of @name itself: it only applies to one of those meanings. -- Benjamin Hawkes-LewisReceived on Sunday, 9 January 2011 13:21:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:20 UTC