- From: Mr. Terje Lea <t.lea@t-lea.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:49:49 +0200
- To: "W3C Validator Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 13:50:55 UTC
Hi Thanks for your reply! This is about the RSS xml format which is CLEARLY defined by the Harvard files, both in words and examples. Thus the channel-tagging and the failure to recognise it comes across as lunacy! What are they doing there? Cheers! On Sep 28, 2010 15:20 "Karl Dubost" <karl+w3c@la-grange.net> wrote: > Hi, > > you might want your mails to <www-validator@w3.org> when it is related > to the validators. > > Le 27 sept. 2010 à 21:05, Mr. Terje Lea a écrit : > > When the validator service can't validate a perfectly good > > channel-tagging > > > > like > > > > Did you mean "check the well formedness". > Which document format are you trying to validate against? > Which validator are you trying to use? (URL) > > You might want to use for checking the well formedness of your markup. > <http://www.xmlvalidation.com/> > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 13:50:55 UTC