Re: Fwd: Re: Check existence of class names from Siegfried Gipp on 2010-08-18 (www-validator@w3.org from August 2010)

From: Siegfried Gipp <siegfried@rorkvell.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:05:11 +0200
To: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>
CC: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <4C6C20D7.5010903@rorkvell.de>

Am 18.08.2010 10:57, schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
> Siegfried Gipp <siegfried@rorkvell.de> writes:
>> <span class="<dc:subject>Discussion about non-existent classes</span>
> 
> ???
> 
> DES

Ahem, is this the whole mail? I remember i wrote much more.

This is just an example of how class names might be constructed using
xml namespaces and well defined class names. So they can be verified. So
what is strange about that?

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 18:02:57 UTC