Re: checklink: error (or opportunity for improvement?) in masquerade option and/or checklink.pod from Ville Skyttä on 2009-05-03 (www-validator@w3.org from May 2009)

From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 12:40:26 +0300
To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <200905031240.27940.ville.skytta@iki.fi>

On Friday 01 May 2009, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:

> I respectfully urge you to run the relatively simple test I
> submitted earlier, to demonstrate that the order
>
>    --masquerade "real surrogate"
>
> is correct / matches the current link checker behavior, and
>
>    --masquerade "surrogate real"
>
> does not match current behavior.

You're absolutely right, documentation fixed now in CVS.  Thanks again.

Received on Sunday, 3 May 2009 09:53:05 UTC