- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:23:58 -0400
- To: dev list <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
- Cc: www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Hello, I would like to report on an e-mail discussion we've had - involving legal advisors for w3c and redhat/fedora. I will try to report in the most accurate way, but IANAL... so be gentle :). The code for our tools is distributed under the W3C software license, which is a very relaxed, opensource-certified, license. However, some parts of our tools require special treatment: * the "valid XXX" icons are generally distributed under the w3c document license, which allows free distribution and use, BUT not modification. * The "chrome" of the validators and link checker include the w3c logo (trademarked, etc) This can cause trouble when we try to distribute the tools in distributions that only allow fully free, open source and modifiable packages. After a long discussion with w3c-legal, I would like to suggest the following conclusions: 1) We should remove the "valid XXX" icons from our distribution, and link to them from our tool. This is not, FWIW, the advice of w3c- legal, but it seems to be the simplest solution that would cause the least amount of trouble. Alternatively, we could keep distributing these icons in most distributions and patch whenever needed, but that seems a little more complex. 2) We should try and differentiate the “chrome” of the validator hosted at validator.w3.org from the one distributed. There were some instances of people abusing the confusion, installing w3c-validator- lookalikes and tricking people and search engines into thinking they were "the real thing". W3C-legal strongly recommends it, and I understand: they don't want to spend their time running after those people with cease&desist, or try to figure out whether an instance of the validator is genuine or ill-intentioned. A simple first step would be to "replace" the w3c logo in the distributed software with a more "vanilla" logo. Think for example of how mediawiki comes distributed with a sunflower logo instead of the wikipedia logo. I suggest keeping both logos under CVS, and have the makefile for packaging replace "w3c.png" with the vanilla logo. I started changes to that effect in the link checker today. Ville, would you be able to review the changes and tell me if you think they make sense? Thank you, olivier -- olivier Thereaux - W3C Open Source Software : http://www.w3.org/Status Do you ♥ Validators? Donate or become a Sponsor: http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/Donate
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 21:24:11 UTC