- From: Andreas Prilop <prilop2008@trashmail.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 17:16:26 +0200 (MEST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
On Mon, 5 May 2008, olivier Thereaux wrote: > http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/ I use http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/multilingual1.htm http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/test.htm http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/temp/lang-attribute.htm for testing. I agree with Jukka that the wording "Tentatively passed" is not a good idea. Code positions not defined in ISO-8859-1 or Windows-1252 (such as 0x90 = 144) should be listed as errors - as it is done in version 0.8.2. In the qa-dev version, they are not listed as errors. >> The W3C validator just reports "non SGML character number ...", >> which is still better than to sit there and to do nothing. > > For most people, however, "non SGML character number" is gibberish, True - but this is only the heading. There is a rather longish explanation consisting of three (!) paragraphs with reference to Alan Flavell's pages, etc. I think this explanation (in the current version 0.8.2) is okay.
Received on Monday, 5 May 2008 15:17:13 UTC