- From: R.W. Crowl <silvermaplesoft@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:46:28 -0400
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
> Validating http://www.jtbusa.com/en/default.asp > Error [76]: "element X undefined" My problem is not with this error message; it seems to be adequate to the task. Rather my problem is with the wasted effort and information with the preceding nine error messages that provide no actionable information because the problem lies with the element reported in this message. Of course there's no attribute X for an element that doesn't exist! Don't waste my time. It may even confuse other users who aren't so familiar with the validator or even the process of validation of code (compilers, etc.). It even violates the general principle of cascading error messages, i.e., that the reported problem may be caused by a preceding error that confuses the error recovery system. In this instance it's impossible to fix a previously reported error because the error isn't reported until after the useless message. While there will always be issues and arguments about proper error reporting and recovery, this one seems simple. Give me the actionable error only and ignore the others that we all know will automatically go away when the first is fixed. Skip to the next element and continue parsing. R. W Crowl
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2008 04:55:18 UTC