- From: Aristotelis Mikropoulos <amikrop@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:08:13 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <47ceec760812100908m2943d765y42f36190e98d737@mail.gmail.com>
OK, thanks a lot, and I hope you will find a solution as soon as possible. Keep up the good work. :-) On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:13 PM, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > Aristotelis Mikropoulos wrote: > >> I would like to express my opinion about an HTML Validator matter. >> I believe that when it attempts to check the validity of a webpage, after >> the user >> has provided it the webpage's URL, the Validator should sent an "HTTP >> Accept" >> header to the server that hosts the webpage, which header will contain the >> "application/xhtml+xml" MIME Type, in order to let the server know that it >> also accepts >> such a content type. >> > Dealing with content negotiation is a pain - since you need to test all the > outputs under their relevant DTDs. > > Just saying "accept: application/xhtml+xml, etc, etc" will just lead to > HTML versions not being tested. > > Work is under way to provide a way to handle this, but it is currently > experimental. > > http://validator.w3.org/docs/users.html#option-accept > > (Please direct responses to the www-validator mailing list, not directly to > me, thanks) > > -- > David Dorward > -- Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 17:16:08 UTC