Re: Notes on validome test suite / validators comparison

Validome-Staff wrote:

> Validome advices the user to use our XML-Validator, as a HTML-Validator
> is not the appropriated tool to check XML...;-)

When I try to validate <> at your site
I get the same incorrect "valid" result as with the W3C validator.

For the W3C validator I know that it can't (yet) check URI syntax,
but it's disappointing that your validator also fails.  Is than an
issue in the "XHTML 1.0 transitional" schema or in your code ?


Received on Saturday, 20 October 2007 14:23:18 UTC