- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:38:15 +0000
- To: www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Thoughts from IRC:
< yod> tidy's actually not made by us, but I'm wondering if we could
have both the convenience of showing tidy's output in the
validator and making it clear we don't control it
< Dorward> Could stick a button at the top of the "Invalid" result
page. "Attempt to fix errors automatically". Run it
through tidy, input the result into the validator,
revalidate that (we'd need to be able to show source on the
Valid page otherwise the exercise would be pointless) and
include a notice at the top of both the valid and invalid
results pages along the lines of "The code being validated
was processed by <a>Tidy</a>, a software project maintained
by <a>Foo</a> and not under the control of the W3C"
This approach probably wouldn't be compatible with file upload or
direct input validation attempts. Possibly this could be worked around
using CGI::Session?
--
David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:38:20 UTC