- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:38:15 +0000
- To: www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Thoughts from IRC: < yod> tidy's actually not made by us, but I'm wondering if we could have both the convenience of showing tidy's output in the validator and making it clear we don't control it < Dorward> Could stick a button at the top of the "Invalid" result page. "Attempt to fix errors automatically". Run it through tidy, input the result into the validator, revalidate that (we'd need to be able to show source on the Valid page otherwise the exercise would be pointless) and include a notice at the top of both the valid and invalid results pages along the lines of "The code being validated was processed by <a>Tidy</a>, a software project maintained by <a>Foo</a> and not under the control of the W3C" This approach probably wouldn't be compatible with file upload or direct input validation attempts. Possibly this could be worked around using CGI::Session? -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:38:20 UTC