- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:50:07 +0900
- To: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
On Jul 31, 2007, at 20:48 , Sierk Bornemann wrote: >> Indeed, and it doesn't have to. Some have argued it would be >> better if it did. >> Nobody ever sent a reasonable patch to that effect. > > What's about the patch on http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/ > show_bug.cgi?id=18 ? This patch is a good start, but as I commented in http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18#c8 it has a number of issues. At least: * it adds UI options - I don't think it's a good idea * the options are only text/html and application/xhtml+xml, which is way too limited Anyone should, however, feel free to take the idea and make it into something usable. -- olivier
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 03:49:37 UTC