Well have a microsoft office live web site actually I have 4 microsoft office live web sites , it would seem they all have the same page errors , W3 says microsofts programming suck's and their html generators are little better. Microsoft says the programming they use is correct for the format of their web sites ( I wonder how many lawyers it took to come up with that 1 ) . so my compalint to W3 would be , since all microsoft officelive web sites are the same and all have the same errors, should their not be a new family document type for the validator , you know like XHTML 1.0 transitional dumb-ass edition , or microsoft standard screw up edition . Just a thought. Greg Terje Bless <link@pobox.com> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 shane@aptest.com (Shane McCarron) wrote: >All XHTML family docment types should be processed using the XML parsing >mode of the validator. There is never a case where the SGML parsing mode >would work, since all the DTDs are XML DTDs, not SGML DTDs. And current CVS of the Validator lists all XHTML 1.0 FPIs as having Parse Mode XML... - -- I have lobbied for the update and improvement of SGML. I've done it for years. I consider it the jewel for which XML is a setting. It does deserve a bit of polishing now and then. - -- Len Bullard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.8.1 wj8DBQFGNdDZo/I+siR19ewRAhnHAKCW2Z+3ND68yrNJyWgDe/YrsoKthgCbBt53 eEE3ax0kpSzPMlMiN2VXu1o=HyO+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 14:16:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:01 UTC