- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:00:46 +0900
- To: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
- Cc: "www-validator@w3.org Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
Le 27 avr. 2007 à 21:07, Sierk Bornemann a écrit :
> Am 27.04.2007 um 01:39 schrieb Karl Dubost:
>
>> 2. So far sending XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml is wrong
>
> What do you mean with this sentence? I don't get it clearly.
need coffee and sleep
text/html, I meant
>> (Note btw, that once the validator sends accept header
>> application, the
>> configuration mistake of Sierk would not be detected, which is
>> bad too)
>
> What do you mean with this sentence? I don't get it clearly.
> What kind of Accept Header precisely will Validator send?
> What does "once the validator sends accept header application"
> clearly means?
> Why wouldn't it be detected by my configuration either?
If you have configured to send
XHTML 1.1 as text/html to IE. It is wrong
if the validator sees only the version you send with the appropriate
mime-type, then your case for IE stays undetected and you perpetuate
your mistake.
> Would you point each user out there to configure his browser/OS so,
> that Firefox will open, if he wants to surf a XHTML webpage, which
> is served with "appliocation/xhtml+xml"?
> I think, you wouldn't. Because that's far from being practical for
> public. If that is your intention, then XHTML 1.1 and all
> successors have no chance to be used public and they would never have.
I explained what I was doing.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2007 02:01:03 UTC