- From: Greg Sabin <movingpictures4u@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
- To: drake@begriffli.ch, cewcathar@hotmail.com
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <617464.26631.qm@web30602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
It would be nice if they had made the current validator to work with all web sites before attempting to make a new one , I notice that the XHTML validator will find errors in XHTML web sites using subscript , superscript , and HTML box's that display's HTML or a I-Frame linked to a java based flash player , But after my dealings with Google as well as Yahoo , I can see how all the large corporations ( yes this includes .org's that follow suit ) have nothing better to do then put the little guy in the middle . But I suppose its just human nature to fight and battle like children rather then to work together . Greg Drake Wilson <drake@begriffli.ch> wrote: Quoth CE Whitehead , on 2007-04-23 13:55:41 -0400: > and said that my p and hr elements were not open & did not need > closing--the code is simiply as it is below-- > this seems bizarre (you always close the hr element or I do--it's required > in xhtml; this is html though but it's an option certainly; also elements > can be embedded in other elements, except where a block element is embedded > in an inline element, & that's not the problem here; the hr is used to > divide off the statement saying that this document is a translation that > the normative version is that of the W3C, etc.): Both HTML 4.01 Strict and XHTML 1.0 Strict declare the "hr" tag as empty, that is, not capable of containing anything. So no, --------------------------------- .. with stuff inside doesn't make any sense. Which doctype is this? ---> Drake Wilson --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 06:49:52 UTC