- From: CPRG Limited <craig@cprgltd.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:46:27 -0400
- To: "'Nikita The Spider'" <nikitathespider@gmail.com>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Philip-- My apologies. I realized your probable reference after my reply. First, this is not my code. It is a remedy provided by Microsoft. Whether or not, the capability JavaScript value should be listed as "false", I have no idea. It works, works on multiple ASP.NET applications, resolves the downlevel issue and was designed to exclusively specify the W3C Validation engine user agent string. If you have first-hand knowledge that certain ASP.NET applications will not be rendered appropriately for the W3C Validation agent and produce validation errors without changing the value to 'false', please advise and advise Microsoft. Thanks. C. Thacker -----Original Message----- From: Nikita The Spider [mailto:nikitathespider@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 10:25 PM To: craig@cprgltd.com Cc: www-validator@w3.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: asp.net panel browser inconsistencies On 9/16/06, CPRG Limited <craig@cprgltd.com> wrote: > Philip-- > > This is not JavaScript. It is a simple XML structured file that is > read by .NET Framework that identifies the W3C Validation engine so > that when .NET Framework renders the ASP.NET source code is not > downleveled and maintains the specified DTD Strict model. This code > is never sent to a browser. It gets rendered at the server by .NET. Craig, I realize that you don't know me, but please give me credit for being able to recognize the difference between XML and Javascript! =) I was referring to this line in your XML: <capability name="javascript" value="true" /> I don't know ASP.Net but it sure looks to me like that line tells ASP.Net that interpreting Javascript is a capability of the W3C Validator. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikita The Spider [mailto:nikitathespider@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 10:09 PM > To: craig@cprgltd.com > Cc: www-validator@w3.org > Subject: Re: Re: Re: asp.net panel browser inconsistencies > > On 9/16/06, CPRG Limited <craig@cprgltd.com> wrote: > > > > <browsers> > > <browser id="W3C_Validator" parentID="default"> > > <identification> > > <userAgent match="^W3C_Validator" /> > > </identification> > > <capabilities> > > <capability name="browser" value="W3C Validator" /> > > <capability name="ecmaScriptVersion" value="1.2" /> > > <capability name="javascript" value="true" /> > > <capability name="supportsCss" value="true" /> > > <capability name="tables" value="true" /> > > <capability name="tagWriter" > > value="System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter" /> > > <capability name="w3cdomversion" value="1.0" /> > > </capabilities> > > </browser> > > </browsers> > > Hi Craig, > The settings above might work for you, but FYI the W3C Validator > doesn't support Javascript. Very few (if any) non-browser user agents do so. > > > -- > Philip > http://NikitaTheSpider.com/ > Whole-site HTML validation, link checking and more > >
Received on Sunday, 17 September 2006 02:46:35 UTC