- From: Neerav Modi <neerav@sayni.net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:56:34 +0530
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- Cc: lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au
[I am not receiving replies to this group, cannot find a signup, and unable to reply from the web archives, so I hope this works. Though a CC: in replies would be appreciated, I will continue to check the archives for a couple more days.] In response to "is the DTD valid", it is the official DTD for the mobile phone profile, so I would like to think so, but that doesn't make it so. I have managed to validate other xhtml-mp pages which are directly accessible through the web, which sends the MIME type. That would substanciate the fact that the DTD is correct. =========== The document located at <http://somedomain.com/sompage.php> was checked and found to be valid -//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN. This means that the resource in question identified itself as "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN" and that we successfully performed a formal validation using an SGML or XML Parser (depending on the markup language used). ========== So the conclusion based on the replies in this thread: the mime type is required for xml documents, and thus only the direct URL validation will work for xhtml-mp pages until the validator is upgraded to use other information in the document to determine xml mode. Is that correct? -- Neerav
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 07:54:44 UTC