- From: Eric Bednarz <lists@bednarz.nl>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 03:27:18 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >> The problem is that the validator doesn't use the XML >> declaration as its trigger to use XML mode. > > Is that a bug ? Generally sniffing the prolog in the hope to find clues? Sure. > If a document says <?xml version=" (etc.) > at the begin, maybe after one of the various signatures > for UTF-8, BOCU-1, etc., then it's supposed to be XML, or > isn't it ? For SGML parsing, an 'XML declaration' is just an ordinary processing instruction. > P.S.: Still waiting Ah; all the best, honestly, and don't hold your breath. > for an answer why Jukka's "nobr"-DTD > is not supported. If that's politically motivated > I'm ready with this forum and the W3C. Don't be too fatalistic; the W3C validation service is just a proprietary interface to a validating SGML system; it is unsurprising that its purpose is to support W3C recommendations, not to validate SGML. As to limits, the note in <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/nobr.html#valid> might give some clues. Of course, defaults can change anytime without notice. Within those limits, you can still do whatever you want: <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbednarz.nl%2Ftmp%2Fnobr%2F&ss=1> -- :Eric
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 01:27:47 UTC