- From: Michael Adams <linux_mike@paradise.net.nz>
- Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:02:25 +1300
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 15:03:01 +0000 (GMT) Christoph Schneegans wrote: > > David Dorward wrote: > > >> XHTML provides many benefits for content authors. > > > > None of them client side, > > Sure. Today's so-called HTML user agents don't support arbitrary HTML. > For example, this perfectly valid HTML 4.01 document is rendered in a > different way in IE, Firefox und Opera: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"> > <html> > <head><title></title></head> > <body> > <p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img alt="W3C" > src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_main"</a> Should this text be > underlined?</p></body> > </html> > Perfectly valid if you close the image tag ;) -- Michael Those that can, do; those that can't, teach.
Received on Sunday, 8 October 2006 20:01:49 UTC