- From: Gmail Directeur <directeur@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:49:03 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
> It's unlikely, its changed in the past and will probably > do so again in the fiture.. That is rather the point of > having seperate output formats specifically for machine > processing. Thank you a lot David and Peter, Yes, actually, I was sure about the html template instability, and yes I do understand that. The fact is that machine processable formats (xml and soap) are pretty nice but they don't contain "exactly" the same information that we can read in the html output. Sure, there's errors, errorcount, warning, warningcount... but I see some explanations in the html result page that aren't in the soap result. Yes, integrating this information (the error explanation) in the soap result will make it bigger and maybe not useful for everyone... is it the reason? -- Karim
Received on Sunday, 8 October 2006 15:49:51 UTC