- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 09:57:19 +0100
- To: www-validator@w3.org
This has swerved off-topic, however the better way to refer to the images is "/img/image.jpg" - else you run into trouble when you move the page within the document tree. Anyway, *why* would you want the validator to ignore these entries? an image tag is an image tag... and it should have a src attribute assocciated with it. The validator doesn't care if you have named a non-existant file in that src attribute, not where it is... so long as the string is a valid URI format, the validator should be happy Ville Skyttä wrote: > There should be no reason to ignore such links, and there's nothing > wrong with using "../img/image.jpg" in http://myhost.com/dir1/index.html > in order to link to http://myhost.com/img/image.jpg. > > If possible, please post a concrete public URL where you think the link > checker misbehaves so it can be examined. -- Ian Stuart. Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team, EDINA, The University of Edinburgh. http://edina.ac.uk/
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 08:57:29 UTC