Re: Mistaken XHTML Validation Issues

* David Dorward wrote:
>Perhaps the Note about XML support should be upgraded to a warning?

+1

>And the document it links to rewritten with less jargon?

I think Christoph Schneegans started something for that on esw.w3.org.

>Might it also be worth changing XML reports to say Tentatively Valid
>rather then actually Valid?

-1
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 14:20:44 UTC