- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:45:43 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
Henri Sivonen wrote: > Back when the sniffing was devised, HTML 4.01 was already a REC, so the > heuristic was designed not to require any "yes, really" flag added to > HTML 4.01. > >> <!-- #PRAGMAT mode="Full-standards" --> > > > <!DOCTYPE html> > or > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/ > TR/html4/strict.dtd"> Fine, no problem with that one. > >> <!-- #PRAGMAT mode="Almost-standards" --> > > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> But I want full standards mode with transitional syntax; is that really so unreasonable ? > >> <!-- #PRAGMAT mode="Quirks" --> > > > (No doctype.) > Can't be validated, hence useless (i.e., not HTML at all).
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:44:11 UTC