Re: change for type=

On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 22:37 -0700, metalworship (Jason Lloyd) wrote:
> I wanted to suggest a change for the recognized error  of type=  and
> then no type such as text/css is given.  When type=  shows up in a url
> would it be possible to ingnore it since it is not in a <script
> type=  .....

It shouldn't exhibit such behaviour.

> Here is my example
> I had an error for the & in a url so i fixed it with the &amp;  Next
> error was within the same url because it ends with type=3  giving the
> style type of 3 to communicate with a database. here is the full url..
> http://www6.addfreestats.com/cgi-bin/countnow.cgi?usr=00609664&amp;type=3   Where the type=3 the validator wants a type explanation such as text/css etc etc.

You didn't provide a URL, so I constructed a test case based on your
description of the problem:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://dorward.me.uk/tmp/type-test-case.html

The validator reports no problems with it.

Perhaps there is something else about the context of your code that is
triggering the error? Without seeing the document it is impossible to
say for sure.

(I read the mailing list. Please address responses there and do not CC
me. Thanks)

-- 
David Dorward                           <http://dorward.me.uk/>
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad, in some way or another."
                             -- The Greatest Show in the Galaxy

Received on Monday, 17 April 2006 16:37:29 UTC