- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:39:38 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
"Thomas Mäder" wrote: > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> > Result: Failed validation, 25 errors Start there as long as you want to use your tool. When you're tired of manually fixing its output you'll know enough to use a decent text editor. If you're interested in design issues you could start some experiments with CSS, and in some time you might even wish to use a "strict" DTD. For new pages I love XHTML 1.0 transitional with the absolute minimum of "transitional" crap I can get away with _without_ using CSS, but that's a matter of taste. For "nice" pages you need CSS, and then the best strategy is strict, mixing CSS and legacy markup can have strange side effects: Better don't try this, unless you know exactly what you're doing. HTML 4.01 vs. XHTML 1.0 is also a matter of taste, I prefer the latter because it's simple (as long as you stay away from inline scripts and styles.) Whatever you do, don't use frames. Bye, Frank
Received on Saturday, 8 October 2005 19:43:32 UTC