- From: Beton, Richard <richard.beton@roke.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:16:07 +0000
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > ...However, you should really consider whether or not you want this on > your website. Be sure to Jukka's opinion on the matter before making > up your mind. > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon I thought about Jukka's opinion, having already put 'Valid XHTML' logos on my site. I decided not to remove them for the time being. The icons I used are about half the size of the W3C originals. Feel free to lift them. site: http://www.whr.co.uk/ valid html 4.01: http://www.whr.co.uk/whricons/w3c/vh401.png valid xhtml 1.0: http://www.whr.co.uk/whricons/w3c/vxh10.png valid xhtml 1.1: http://www.whr.co.uk/whricons/w3c/vxh11.png valid css: http://www.whr.co.uk/whricons/w3c/vcss.png any browser: http://www.whr.co.uk/whricons/w3c/ab.png Rick [these remarks are my personal opinions] -- Visit our website at www.roke.co.uk Roke Manor Research Ltd, Roke Manor, Romsey, Hampshire SO51 0ZN, UK. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is proprietary to Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be passed to any third party without permission. This communication is for information only and shall not create or change any contractual relationship.
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 14:16:30 UTC