Hello Albert, On Thu, Apr 28, 2005, Albert Chang wrote: > Ok, I'm trying to make my scripts into xhtml 1.1 strict. I'm just > teaching myself. I already have some knowledge of xhtml. I've been > using 1.0 transitional for a while now. > > The validator said that for xhtml 1.1, the anchor tag no longer supports > the name attribute. Correct, see: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/changes.html#a_changes > However, when I went to > http://www.domstyle.net/tuts/xhtml/xhtml3.html, the name attribute > bypassed the validator. I would like to know why. That document uses a bogus doctype. "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 Strict//EN" is not a correct W3C FPI, "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" is. In other words, be aware that there is no such thing as XHTML 1.1 strict, only XHTML 1.1. Hope this helps. -- olivier Thereaux - W3C / QA / Tools ----- You can help improve the validator: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2005Apr/0031.htmlReceived on Friday, 29 April 2005 02:43:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:50 UTC