- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:38:21 +0000 (GMT)
- To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > If not, I think > end tag for "HEAD" but a required subelement was not found > would be somewhat better the current one. It's illogical to say "which is Just checking, it seems we're in agreement there. Valet's wording for the same error is element "HEAD" ended, but a required sub-element is missing. Liam has missing a required sub-element of HEAD We're both using customised versions of OpenSP error message definitions to generate those; vwo is on the originals. -- Nick Kew
Received on Sunday, 21 November 2004 02:38:54 UTC