- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 07:13:15 +0100
- To: eric schodde <eschodde@austin.rr.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 01:38, eric schodde wrote: > I have typed in a number of known sites (netscape.com, agency.com, > etc..) in your validator program. Everyone, including Dell, and > Apple.com, come up as having HTML validation errors. I am doing this > through Netscape Composer> Validate. It would seem at least the > Apple.com site would register with you as being compliant. If all the > sites I have typed in to your validator, show up on IE, and Netscape > (a very small percentage did not here, but because my cache was full > was the reason) how seriously should we take the validator feedback? > It doesnt seem to be anything that is to concerning to anyone out > there. Please read the FAQ before posting, and use more appropriate subject lines. http://validator.w3.org/docs/why.html and some other views: http://valet.webthing.com/page/why.html http://www.wdvl.com/Authoring/HTML/Validation/Why.html http://www.earth.com/bad-style/why-validate.html http://webdesign.about.com/library/weekly/aa092799.htm -- David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2004 02:19:04 UTC