- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 23:53:08 +0200 (EET)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote: > When I validated my 4.10 Transitional page, I was suggested to include the > "valid-html401" icon on the page, which I did. On what grounds? Was there some rational reason, some real gain to be achieved. In reality, the icon is worse than useless, see http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon > Then I tried to > re-validate my page now using Strict setting and the offending code was > the code suggested for the inclusion of the icon! > > I think this is a bit illogical. No, I wouldn't say so. You had a Transitional doctype, so why couldn't the added code be Transitional? -- Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Friday, 23 January 2004 16:55:44 UTC