- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Jim Ley wrote: >>> >>>> <script src="js/whatever.js"/> >>> this is valid >> >> well, this is valid for XHTML 1.0, for mozilla 1.5 but >> Internet Explorer 6 would render an empty page with a JS error >> because it can't find a closing </script> even if <script ends with /> > > I believe this is a bug in Mozilla 1.5, if you're serving it as text/html. The HTML WG has stated that UAs should treat all text/html content as legacy HTML content (aka Tag Soup): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2000Sep/0024.html It would actually be impossible to do otherwise, anyway, as discussed in the section titled "Why UAs can't handle XHTML sent as text/html as XML" of: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml Arguably, it's a bug in the validator, which should (according to the HTML WG) be treating anything sent as text/html, as HTML, and not as XHTML. >> grrr, sending a bomb to redmond > > The problem is XHTML's, Please direct your complaints to the XHTML Working > Group, particularly request that they actually respond to the related > issues. And in particular that they stop saying XHTML is "compatible" with HTML. Grr. See "The Myth of "HTML-compatible XHTML 1.0 documents" in that same document cited above. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 9 January 2004 13:25:04 UTC