- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:08:57 +0100
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
* Sean B. Palmer wrote: >The language is slightly shoddy, too: isn't an SGML parser also an XML >parser since the latter's meant to subset the former? No. You can parse XML documents using a SGML processor, but you cannot turn a conforming SGML processor into a conforming XML processor without changing the code, SGML processors would not enforce well-formedness for example. (And in fact, the W3C MarkUp Validator does not use an XML processor hence I wonder why it claims to do...) >And /check/referer still doesn't pass its flippin' self? What more >reason do you need to upgrade to the beta?! Do it yesterday already! >:-) Bah, that fuzzy fussy parsing thing is - among other things - borken.
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 16:08:54 UTC