"[W]e successfully performed a formal validation using an SGML or XML Parser (depending on the markup language used)" - same message in :80 and :8001. Surely the doctype declaration should be a good indicator of whether the SGML or XML parser is being used? Ironic especially since the <img> copy-'n'-paste code is munged to fit the language being validated. The language is slightly shoddy, too: isn't an SGML parser also an XML parser since the latter's meant to subset the former? And /check/referer still doesn't pass its flippin' self? What more reason do you need to upgrade to the beta?! Do it yesterday already! :-) -- Sean B. Palmer, <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> "phenomicity by the bucketful" - http://miscoranda.com/Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 15:54:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:39 UTC