- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 14:18:12 +0000
- To: Ed Isenberg <EdPublic@isenberg-family.net>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:17:41AM -0700, Ed Isenberg wrote: > I am using Frontpage 2002 to create web pages, and obviously I must add a > DocType section at the very beginning in order to have the validator check > it. That isn't a problem. What is a problem is the numerous errors: > "end tag [whatever] omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified" > which happens all the time because Frontpage uses a ">" to end a tag > rather than a "/>" Ending a tag with /> is XHTML syntax. Use an HTML Doctype if you are writing HTML. > While I understand that the purpose of the validator is to be strict and > require compliant code, if it is so strict as to make it unusable with > popular web site creation packages like Frontpage, then people will just > stop validating it. ... or complain to the software author until they produce a product which produces the desired markup or switch to a better product. Ignoring syntax errors just becuase bad software makes mistakes would render the use of the validator pointless. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Saturday, 4 December 2004 14:18:15 UTC