- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:01:06 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1092924065.3180.139.camel@stratustier>
Le jeu 19/08/2004 à 15:46, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > >Really? The main reason I've seen in this thread is to warn the user > >when she uses a bogus or inconsistent doctype; that's a user feature, > >not a theoretical one. > > I am opposed to change how the Validator locates a DTD from FPIs/SIs, OK. > what it should do in order to figure out whether FPI and SI disagree > in some sense and how it should behave in that case in terms of feed- > back to the user is a different question. That's the one that interests me, FWIW. > >I imagine that there would be a catalog of FPI bound to System Ids; when > >validating a document, the Validator would absolutize the System ID, and > >see whether it matches the one associated to the FPI. > > http://validator.w3.org/sgml-lib/xml.soc kindly demonstrates that > maintenance of the existing catalogs is quite difficult already... A very valid concern, indeed; I think this shows the cost of having 2 conflicting identifications systems in use, but that doesn't help practically speaking. > >Do you seriously believe that people that are going to put consciously a > >different system identifier would be confused by such a note? > > It would not surprise me much, but that's only part of the story, it is > common that people use the Validator to validate other people's web site > and such users are much more likely to get confused. If the Validator > generates more noise for page X than for page Y, page X is less "valid" > then page Y, that's a quite common "confusion". Hmm... To me, it would be of the same kind as what you get today when the validator gives a warning due to a mismatch between the HTTP header charset parameter and the encoding specified in the document, which I haven't seen generate much confusion; said otherwise, I'm pretty sure there is a way to formulate such a warning so that it doesn't generate that much confusion. But your experience on the matter probably makes you a better judge of this :) Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 14:01:11 UTC