- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:31:10 +0100
- To: ghi@ctmagazin.de
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 19:27, Gerald Himmelein wrote: > Perhaps a warning message/word of caution might be in order when the > Markup Validator encounters the <ins> tag... The validator works off DTDs, I suspect it would take a fairly severe shift in architecture to persuade it to perform that type of additional check. > > While it is *valid* HTML, it is non-conforming. > > Just to make sure that I don't misunderstand you: What you are stating > is that using <ins> in the manner previously described is incorrect. Thats right. Placing a block element inside an inline ins is not allowed in HTML - but that rule can't be expressed in a way that the validator can understand. -- David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:33:39 UTC