- From: Gerald Himmelein <ghi@ctmagazin.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:27:20 +0200
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
Original Date. Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 8:16:54 PM Mr Dorward, > Its a limitation of DTDs. There isn't anyway to express that X is > allowed as a child of Y *unless* Y is a child of Z. Perhaps a warning message/word of caution might be in order when the Markup Validator encounters the <ins> tag... > While it is *valid* HTML, it is non-conforming. Just to make sure that I don't misunderstand you: What you are stating is that using <ins> in the manner previously described is incorrect. > Validation only checks for a subset of conformance to the > specification (i.e. that which can be expressed using the DTD). Thanks for clearing this up. Sincerely, Gerald Himmelein Redaktion c't mail: ghi@ctmagazin.de Home: http://www.ctmagazin.de/Redaktion/ghi/ -- Randomly selected Quote: ("Room service? Send up a larger room." Groucho Marx)
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2004 18:28:30 UTC