- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:34:33 +0300 (EEST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > > > Interestingly, the W3C "markup validator" then says that > > "This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!" > > (something I really did not ask it to check) > > Didn't you? I definitely didn't. I asked it to validate the markup. That is, to report whether it is valid or not. > Did you by any chance hack that DTD but forget to set HTML.Version? I submitted a document, and the validator reported "This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!" Whether someone thinks that the DTD is "hacked" should be no concern of a validator. Neither should the origin of the DTD. If I changed the definition of the entity HTML.Version, _that_ would be hacking, wouldn't it? And if I change it to <!ENTITY HTML.Version "my way"> then I get the report "This page is not Valid !" when it actually is. Should I be happier now? I don't know what game the validator is playing with HTML.Version. If I have missed something and it is actually doing the right thing, please cite the relevant clause of the SGML standard. -- Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Monday, 15 September 2003 00:34:36 UTC