- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:08:23 +0100
- To: "Ageer, Lenin B" <lbagee@essex.ac.uk>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
On Tuesday, Oct 21, 2003, at 12:45 Europe/London, Ageer, Lenin B wrote: > we are in the process of making our website W3c(XTML 1.0 Transitional) > and Bobby AAA(W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0.). Bobby is a tool, it is less then perfect. Its difficult to automatically test for a lot of things (how is a machine going to know if some client side scripting and whatever alternative you provide do the same job?), so its a good idea to perform the checks by hand (with a good understanding of the issues of course). > But I am facing a problem there is a clash between xhtml and bobby.A > Form element (select ) causing this problem. Bobby requires 'selected' > but xhtml 1.0 don't allow 'selected' attribute. Yes it does, just not in its minimised form. <option ... selected="selected">. The issue appears to have nothing to do with the w3c validator (so why is this thread on this list?), but more to do with Bobby either not understanding XHTML 1.0 or understanding it but considering non-minimised attributes to be inaccessible. File a bug report with Bobby if its a bug, and ask yourself why you are using XHTML in the first place. User agent support for it is currently very limited. For a professional site, I suggest you stick with HTML 4.01 until support improves (although I'd go with the Strict variant rather then Transitional). (BTW - that <select> loses out on the accessibility front on other, more serious, issues. It doesn't appear to be capable of performing a sensible function when JavaScript is not available - you might want to have a read of http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/forms/navmenu.html ) -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:07:51 UTC