* Terje Bless wrote: >>>Perhaps you want to take a look at this: [SNIP long URL] >> >>Right, that bug is still in version 0.6.2b2 of the validator running at >><http://validator.w3.org:8001/>. Fixing it would take longer than >>filing a bug report so here we go :) >><http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=262> > >It actually too on the order of 8 hours to get right for all the edge cases I >could come up with. The code in question was designed back in the days of HTML >3.2 when closing elements was optional and relied heavily on not needing to >close either the <li> or <ul> elements. :-( HTML 3.2 does not allow to omit </ul>... :-PReceived on Sunday, 6 July 2003 15:40:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:35 UTC