- From: java java <cop3252@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
--- Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, java java wrote: > > > OK, but how do I > > Read your server docs for content negotiation. > > For example, with Apache you could use Options > +multiviews > > Quoted from http://httpd.apache.org/docs/content-negotiation.html "Apache's support for content negotiation has been updated to meet the HTTP/1.1 specification. It can choose the best representation of a resource based on the browser-supplied preferences for media type, languages, character set and encoding." This will work but only if the validator specifies that it can accept application/xhtml+xml !! Since the validator CAN validate XHTML 1.1 and the standards specify that XHTML 1.1 SHOULD be served as application/xhtml+xml then why is it a problem to have the validator say that it CAN accept application/xhtml+xml No page that was validated before adding that the validator can accept application/xhtml+xml will become invalid. It will behave identically to how it did before, it will just state EXPLICITLY that it CAN accept application/xhtml+xml. I ask, please show me a way to have my pages served as application/xhtml+xml to the validator without knowing that it can accept application/xhtml+xml. Given that my pages are served as text/html UNLESS a UA explicitly states that it can accept application/xhtml+xml. Using Apache Options multiviews STILL requires that the UA state that it can accept application/xhtml+xml. -- > Nick Kew > > In need of paying work - > http://www.webthing.com/~nick/cv.html > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2003 19:56:58 UTC