Re: iso_8859-1 still not recognized as valid.

Anton Gombkötö wrote:

> Please let the validator know that iso_8859-1 is valid.

Shouldn't it be "iso-8859-1" ?
--------------------^

-- 
Guillaume Cocatre-Zilgien
Web Developer
@listen_to Underworld - Beaucoup Fish

Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 06:30:35 UTC