On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Bob Rosenberg wrote: > What CHARSET did you declare (or default to) in your META tag? If it > was ISO-8859-1 then the codes in the 128-159 codepoint range are > INVALID and should either be coded using &name; entries (such as > “) or as their Unicode Codepoint equivalents (ὐ/17/20/21; > for the "curly quotes" if I remember correctly). > > If you DO claim to be WIN-1252 then (at least in theory) the > Validator is in error since the use of the 129-159 codepoints are > VALID since they represent valid glyphs in that character-set. No, that's not true. &#ddd; always refers to the Unicode code point, regardless of the Content-Type's charset parameter. -- Liam QuinnReceived on Monday, 1 July 2002 00:54:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:28 UTC