- From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:59:09 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Franklen Choi <franklen@pacific.net.hk>
- cc: www-validator@w3.org, <gerald@w3.org>
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Franklen Choi wrote: > Example 2: Tidy converts many Chinese characters, and even tags, of my > documents into "?" (The option 'raw' is already selected). (While there > is a binary executable version of the program which supports Asian > characters, it is being in the state of 'unsupported'). This means I > can hardly take the advantage of Tidy when many books and web-sites > recommend it. One of the few things that makes emacs worth using is that it preserves binary characters (vi doesn't) . Look into emacs macros that provide similar functionality to tidy... > I really hope that internationalization is not something regarded as a > luxury. It would be nice to think that thanks to UTF-8, support for the common subset and recognition and handling of binary strings should improve. L. <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 06:59:33 UTC