W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Warn about unknown parameters

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 04:55:47 +0200
To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <meremtoapjdatcsjeltovagr67ga2uj9s4@4ax.com>
* Terje Bless wrote:
>>>>In our german web authoring newsgroup Thomas Mager just wondered why

>Yeah, I'm kinda with you so far, but how does that change whether or not
>the page is Valid?

http://www.art-emilio.de/galerie.shtml?Acryl;1 valid
http://www.art-emilio.de/galerie.shtml?Acryl invalid.

User wants to validate the first one but the Validator retrieves and
validates the latter.

>We ignore unknown parameters completely

Yes, that's what I am complaining about. Unknown parameters should get
reported to avoid confusion.


*argl*! :-)

>We end up requesting a different page and that page happens
>to be invalid? So the extra params aren't affecting _our_ behaviour, it's
>the _lack_ of params that makes the _validated_ server change _it's_
>«behaviour»? IOW, it's not an error in the Validator -- the error lies with
>the user failing to escape CGI params -- it's just that it would be a
>usefull feature to actually give a warning about it to make the user aware
>that s/he needs to escape these characters?

We can harldy do that. Complain about invalid parameters is fair enough.

Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 22:56:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:23 UTC