Re: XHTML validation broken?

On 27.07.01 at 23:14, R Duarte <rahji@rahji.com> wrote:

>Sorry, I'm not a member of the list, but the validator.w3.org contact page
>said that I could just email the list anyway.  Please check out
>http://www.rahji.com .  The entire site has validated as XHTML 1.0 when
>you click the W3C logo at the bottom of the page for a year or so now.  I
>just checked today and the validator says that the pages validate as HTML
>4.0 instead!  The doctype on my site hasn't changed so I'm wondering if
>something's been broken on the validator recently.  Please let me know if
>you have any ideas.

This was apparently stuck in a queue somewhere because it didn't show up on
the list until today (Monday, that is). Sorry about that.

Anyways, that page validates as XHTML 1.0 and the results agree that it's
XHTML 1.0. Did you change something after you sent the message?

Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 20:43:35 UTC