- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:52:42 +0200
- To: Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@optimalco.com>
- cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, "'www-validator@w3.org'" <www-validator@w3.org>
On 23.07.01 at 09:24, Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@optimalco.com> wrote: >One immediate hurdle to overcome would be getting folks like Google to use >valid HTML as a starting point [1]. IFF they could be sold on the Good >Thing-ness of valid HTML, such an idea might be workable. > ><http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.google.com&doctype=HTML+4.01+Transitional> Wow! I'd have actually expected them to be significantly worse. That's just a few unquoted attributes, and missing "type" for style and script. My personal web pages have more errors then that when I first check it after a redesign! :-) The upshot being, obviously, that getting them to produce valid HTML won't necessarily be all that hard of a sell since they're nearly there already. Are you taking down notes here Karl? :-)
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 19:52:50 UTC