Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML from Terje Bless on 2001-07-22 (www-validator@w3.org from July 2001)

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 21:57:09 +0200
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
cc: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, jason r tibbetts <tibbettj@verdi.iisd.sra.com>, "'www-validator@w3.org'" <www-validator@w3.org>, William Sheppard <will@nicnames.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20010722215741-r01010700-15488aff-0910-010c@192.168.1.6>

On 22.07.01 at 21:35, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

>* Terje Bless wrote:
>>Maybe, maybe not. There is the question of the percieved performance of
>>the Validator. See for instance
>><URL:http://builder.cnet.com/webbuilding/pages/Authoring/HtmlValid/ss06.html>.
>
>You did realize, that this page is about 3 years old?

Two points:

1) What's changed in the intervall?
2) The link was found from WebStandards.org's current references!

Received on Sunday, 22 July 2001 15:59:03 UTC