Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML from Terje Bless on 2001-07-22 (www-validator@w3.org from July 2001)

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:05:47 +0200
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, jason r tibbetts <tibbettj@verdi.iisd.sra.com>, "'www-validator@w3.org'" <www-validator@w3.org>, William Sheppard <will@nicnames.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20010722200646-r01010700-03b49e29-0910-010c@192.168.1.6>

[ Apologies if this arrives twice. Problems with my email setup... ]

On 22.07.01 at 01:11, Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> wrote:

>This is off-topic for validator list, though.

Maybe, maybe not. There is the question of the percieved performance of the
Validator. See for instance
<URL:http://builder.cnet.com/webbuilding/pages/Authoring/HtmlValid/ss06.html>.

Received on Sunday, 22 July 2001 14:06:49 UTC