- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:07:11 +0200
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: tkinias@optimalco.com, "'www-validator@w3.org'" <www-validator@w3.org>, www-html@w3.org
* Martin Duerst wrote:
>At 04:32 01/06/05 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>>* Thanasis Kinias wrote:
>> >The validator complains about "non-SGML character" references (e.g., “
>> >instead of the correct “) only when validating as XHTML. That implies
>> >that “ and the other Microsoft characters from decimal 128-159 (hex
>> >80-9f) _are_ valid in HTML.
>>
>>They are, they just refer to non-printing control characters.
The other way round, valid XML, invalid HTML.
> CHARSET
> BASESET "ISO Registration Number 177//CHARSET
> ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993 UCS-4 with
> implementation level 3//ESC 2/5 2/15 4/6"
> DESCSET 0 9 UNUSED
> 9 2 9
> 11 2 UNUSED
> 13 1 13
> 14 18 UNUSED
> 32 95 32
> 127 1 UNUSED
> 128 32 UNUSED
> 160 55136 160
> 55296 2048 UNUSED -- SURROGATES --
> 57344 1056768 57344
>Actually, these code positions are valid (though rather useless)
>in XML, but they are invalid in HTML. So I'm not sure what the
>result is for XHTML.
x'posted to www-html@w3.org. Are the as unused declared characters from
HTML 4.0 valid in XHTML 1.0?
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2001 19:08:16 UTC