- From: ahby <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 07:36:44 -0600
- To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- CC: WWW HTML <www-html@w3.org>, Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>, nick@webthing.com, www-validator@w3.org
Terje Bless wrote: > > [ Moving to www-html as per mimasa's request. ] > [ ] > [ BTW, I miss newsgroups! Anyone at W3 up for setting up a gateway? ] > > On 02.01.01 at 10:12, Shane P. McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > >I think that Masa may have confused some people here: > > > >Masayasu Ishikawa wrote: > >> > >> Also note that in the XHTML Basic specification, the "id" attribute is > >> NOT used on the "a" element, but on other elements like "h2" and "dt". > > > >To be clear, the source of the XHTML Basic document never uses the id > >attribute on the "a" element as an anchor point, instead relying upon > >the id attribute of elements like h2 and dt. This is because some older > >browsers do not support the HTML 4 required behavior of permitting the > >id attribute of the "a" element to be an anchor. > > Are you trying to say that "While `idŽ /can/ be used on `AŽ, it's not > necessary as it was with `<A name="foo">Ž, and some browsers do not support > it, so XHTML Basic _prefers_ that you place `idŽ attributes on other > elements to achieve the same effect"? It sounds like both you and Masayasu > Ishikawa[0] are saying that `<A id="foo">Ž is actually illegal in XHTML > Basic, and I assume that's incorrect? No. We are saying nothing of the kind. I don't know how to make this clearer, but I will try... In XHTML Basic there is no name attribute for the a element. Therefore, you must use the id attribute to a when defining an anchor point in a document. Unfortunately, this does not work with some older browsers. To get around this, the XHTML Basic specification, which itself is written in XHTML Basic, does not use the a element to define anchors. Instead, it uses other elements such as h2 and dt and THEIR id attributes. > > [0] - Is "Masa" the correct shortening or is that overly familiar? > With English names I have a vague idea, but with Japanese(?) > I'm way out of my dept. Would Masayasu-san be correct or have > I seen too many bad WWII movies? :-) Don't know on this - sorry.
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 08:38:15 UTC